"He sticks to debate."

Nonsense.

He ignores debate and generalizes that anyone who disagrees with his generalizations is a "liberal" with a "liberal agenda"

In fact, just about every post I have read from him in the last year or so is on the subject of his precious "liberal Agenda"

He has, to his credit, argued well that Britain in the US have no right to be In Pakistan killing civilians there, but this does not give him the right to generalize about Pakistanis in Britain, or Tinkers, or "liberals", or homosexuals, or whatever other demographic he wishes to pigeonhole and slander.


The reason you end up being lumped in with him is that you more often than not come running to his aid when he makes such generalizations.

I'd like to see you question his views once in a while rather than picking fights with his political opponents and then crying "not fair" when you are associated with his views.