"The explanation for the BP gangs was not mine."

Oh really? Then what is this?

"My hypothesis is that the absence of girls available for sexual relationships in the BP culture may be linked to their young men being over represented in this type of crime."

So you are not only lying about British Pakistanis and about my words, but also about your words.

By the way, could your expert witness and arbiter of Morality possibly be convicted criminal Lord Ahmed? Expelled from the Labour Party in 2009?


You have nothing Keith.

Your summary is "feebly" provocative at best and sheer deluded fantasy at worst.

The first post is about "Muslim Prejudice".

The posts about Pakistanis were made in this context.

Your defence of these posts, and your hypothesis were made in this context.

Your argument has been torn yto ribbons, so the only tactic you have left is to shut your eyes, pretend it never happened, and tell lies.


And I love Akes preposterous argument that if the liberal press didn't make an outcry against something then it never happened.


You are a couple of poisonous old fools.