"It is an established fact anyway, so there can not be a predisposition to rape."

Oh Good - so you don't think this any more:

""you are suggesting that their culture inspires an inevitable predisposition to the grooming and abuse of underage girls,"

Delete "inevitable" with "slight" and that, for me, is fair comment."


Your last post again fails to affress any of my pointsm but just gives yet another inaccurate synopsis of the discussion.

"Is it fair to say that you think it wrong to speculate on the reason?"

No - but this speculation has been wrung out and hung out to dry.

It is wrong to concentrate solely on blaming "British Pakistani culture" (as if it were somehoow isolated) to the deliberate exclusion of all other possibilities.


"The massive over representation in this crime is also a fact."

Again, this is misleading and disingenuous.

In all crimes committed by Raul Moat, Raul Moa was overrepresented.

In all crimes committed by the Sicilian Mafia, Sicilians have been overrepresented.

In all crimes committed by predominantly Pakistani gangs, Pakistanis have been overrepresented.

All are meaningless statements.

The only thing that differentiates these crimes is the manner of abduction, and the oly thing unique about the methods employed by these gangs is that they abduct their victims from the street in flash cars.

That distinction is not a factor that can be attributeds to Pakistani cylture.


"Lox, you can not challenge what I say, so you must impugn my motive."

This is another lie very clearly contradicted by the fact that all your arguments have been answered and rebutted.


So - what other aarguments would you like to dredge up to support this racist hypothesis?

PS - I note you have also ignored my many quuestions ... why is that?