Just been reading your post Keith,

Yasmin Browns comments included this phrase:

"Lord Ahmed of ­Rotherham has been assailed, abused and ripped apart by the ­religious and cultural guardians of those ­communities"

eh?

Hang on ...


I though you were saying that he represented those communities?

Is that not true?

Are they in fact angry with him?

So he doesn't actually speak for British Pakistanis as you claim?

Well thanks for clarifying that.


"Some Asian husbands trapped in loveless, dead ­relationships become ­frustrated, their desires ­emotionally distorted"

How interesting - is this a phenomenon that only exists in Asian Marriages?

Or could it be possible that it applies across the board?

Or is the point perhaps that only Asian men respond to being in loveless marriages by committing rape?

Why don't white people in loveless marriages respond by committing rape?

If they do, is rape a realistic consequence of being trapped in a loveless marriage?

So now we know - rapists are not vilent men who seek to control and humiliate women, but they are lonely unloved men who are looking for enotional succour for their poor neglected souls.

But back to these communities and elders etc who are allegedly rounding on Lord Ahmed in such numbers ...

... do their opinions not matter, or is it only the opinion of a wealthy journalist and a wealthy aristorat that represent the views of British Pakistani communities?

It seems to me that Lord Ahmend has alienated himself from the actual community who DISAGREE with him.

So now whose views represent Grassroots British Pakistanis more accurately Keith?

Mine thats who!