"I am pointing out the arrogant egotism, verging on megalomania, of you telling us you can see flaws in their assertions that are invisible to mere mortals, so that we should dismiss all their testimony in favour of yours. "

Keith, I have offered no testimony.

There is nothing arrogant or egotistical about questioning a hypothesis.

If there are answers to the inconsistencies that I have highlighted, then someone is at liberty to provide them.

As for invisible flaws, they are only invisible to you because you can't be bothered to read them.

Megalomania?

You maen like you suggesting I should Know my place and not dare to question your point of view or the point of view of politicians that share your point of view?

three politicians and a journalist have expressed a point of view - THATS IT.

Are you suggesting that questioning politicians is "megalomaniac"?

thats what I've done. I've questioned their views.

Noone has provided satisfactory answers.

Least of all you.

Perhaps you could get a job as Lord Ahmeds bodyguard ... or better yet, his chauffeur.