When a judge asks for "clarification" he is seeking a logical conclusion of arguement which cannot be refuted so that appeal is negated. When a judge does not ask for same when warranted he shows incompetence in disregard for the law.

Simple? No.

Perhaps Clarey advises the other judges in chambers and wishes to remain the brain behind some of the pointed questions? Recall "Beyond a shadow of doubt." before you discard the question.

Clarey didn't get to the big show by being a dummie. Sure, he made some bad jokes but he can't be hung for them.

Yes, I did. Sue me.