""Of all the alternative explanations that you and Lox have put forward, which would you say is the most reasonable Don??""

You've tried that route too often. You said yourself that you don't bother reading our posts.

Read the bloody posts, then you might know the answer to the above question.

1. At least half a dozen others have pointed out that Paedophilia, Rape and Trafficking are not intrinsically religious crimes, but committed by criminals of every class and culture.

2. The circumstance you describe regarding Muslim restrictions on sex might lead to promiscuous sex outside their own community, but, with the number of willing and promiscuous young women available in almost every town in Britain, why would that lead to the crimes under discussion? The easiest and safest course would be to avail themselves of those girls and avoid the risk of jail.

3. The obvious conclusion is that they are first predisposed to these crimes, and only incidentally British Muslim Pakistanis. It happens that a number of cases have appeared in an area where there is an anomalously high population of Pakistanis, and it is no surprise that the gangs are composed primarily of such, given that most of the surrounding white population share your view of immigrant minorities.

Don T.

P.S. Keith will only read the first four lines or so, bless him. It's all his attention span can manage.

P.P.S. Akenaton, you have added nothing of value in the last three hundred posts. Why not just STFU and leave it to those who have.