Keith,

You don't need to restate your case because I've read it.

In fact, I've synopsized it in one short post, in a way that you described as a "fair precis".

I understand your view and I've shown how it doesn't work.

I've read your "evidence" and shown how it is unreliable.


You on the other hand respond to points of view that you invented, while ignoring points of view that have actually been stated and that you aven't been bothered to read.


This is a written medium not a spoken one, and every view stated remains above in print.

Asking me to restate my views is equivalent to being too lazy to read a book and asking the author to write the same book again just for you.

It is redundant.

I have been asking you to respond to my actual posts now for over a week and you have been unable to do so.