So "..... these complex issues are not best dealt with by tackling numerous points simultaneously..."??? Tell me Keith, do you have to turn the shower off to sing? Do you pull over to the side of the road so you can toot your horn?

You already have the points I raised. So, rather than prevaricate, just answer them. In any way you choose. Singly or in combination is fine. But please do try to be coherent and please do not insult me with Googled C&Ps. Please let me have the benefit of your own wisdom and input. By all means cite sources if you must but do try and avoid massive slabs of texts from your research (sic), presented as incontrovertible evidence to support your theses. That is, purely and simply, lazy and intellectually incompetent. You see, as others have pointed out, the sources you quote from are invariably selective (that's ok) and often misrepresentative of the wider perspective which these people hold (that's not ok). Much better that you actually apply yourself and set out your position logically, lucidly and coherently.

Also, I would be grateful for further elaboration of my "twisted agenda". Please explain how you deduce that I have an agenda in the first place.Also, what you perceive that "agenda" to be. And,finally, please tell me how and why you label it "twisted". And, no, simply stating that I have had the temerity to disagree with you previously will not cut it.

Over to you.