Jim:
Thank you in return for your moderate response; but I would point out that you refer once again to 'prostitution' in your reply to Keith in the same post. I would refer you back again to my argument in my previous post addressed to you, that grooming for sexual abuse, which is the alleged offence at issue, is not the same offence as organising prostitution, & that the introduction & reiteration of this element in your argument is a distraction from the main point.

Cobra:
I note the previous accusation against Keith which you have pertinently revived; and take it into account in considering his arguments. & I do appreciate its force. It does not, however, seem to me to be absolutely fatal to the points he has been making, in the main cogently in my view, on this thread.

~M~