Jim, the authors did not say their report should be burned.
They stood by it.
53 out of 56 convisted were BPs.
Rightly they pointed out that they had no evidence that it was representative of a general problem.
But they did find it wherever they looked.

And now there is evidence that it is a general problem.
Evidence that the result was not an aberration, but typical.
All those people had been dealing with the problem on a huge scale, in many cities for many years.

The ridiculous Lox thinks he found "flaws in their arguments."
They made no arguments.
They reported their direct experience.

Are either of you saying they are all racist liars?