Hi Ruthie / Joannie. Thank you for your time and most eloquent explanation of Sidmouth's programming policy as you see it. It is undoubtedly a thankless task and most difficult to execute.

I was aware of the full list of ceilidh bands who were booked. My point was one of 'excellence' which Sidmouth has always been associated with. I am afraid that TigerMoth do not equate to such as Peeping Tom, Whapweasel, Tickled Pink, Bedlam, Toothless Mary, Woodpeckers, Polkaworks etc etc. Simon Care is brilliant but over exposed with several dance formats under his wing and I am afraid that his rather unpredictable line-ups with his 'All Stars' or 'Serendipity' again doesn't smack of assured quality. Old Swan are fine for the old style 'village music sound' but please don't programme them for the Bulverton which would be a mis-programmed venue for them and us. As someone who attends 4 or 5 whole seasons of ceilidhs around the country I know that I speak on behalf of several Sidmouth faithfuls - until now.

I am up for fun as much as the next person and the themed evenings at the Bulverton are always a good laugh. My point, was the over repititional use of artists which is becoming more evident. I am concerned because it is similar to the useage of so called 'TV celebs' to front programmes outside of their experiences and skill set. Eg What makes a gardener suddenly become a great chat show host (Alan Tichmarsh). Just because Mrs or Mr 'so and so' are good 'folk musicians' why should they be great at everything else they turn their hand to ... also why is expected that people would want to pay to see them over and over?

Oh well never mind ... I am sure that the new Sidmouth will be fine for a while, but just bear in mind that the traditional audience might well disappear over time ... and through death. But maybe you don't want old dinosaurs anymore!!