Are you incapable of separating the two issues Lox?

ISSUE 1. Is there are disproportionate number of BPs involved in street grooming and rape of children in certain cities?

The hard evidence of the survey alone is highly suggestive that it is true, and in conjunction with all the other evidence leaves any rational thinking person with little doubt that the over representation is a fact.
No hypothesis there.

ISSUE 2. GIVEN that a disproportionate number of BPs are involved in this cruel and wicked crime, what makes them do it?

This is not amenable to proof.
The hypothesis was made by people with deep knowledge of the community, or actually part of it.
They all agree on the same hypothesis.

On the first issue Lox, Jim and Don, do you have any other explanation, other than bizarre coincidence, for all the evidence?

On the second issue, why should we listen to you and ignore them?