No I did not Keith - I selected the part of the article which contained the warning about the findings being abused by racists such as your good self, which was my stated reason for posting it - you accepted it as such and referred to it as 'a typical Guardian headline'.
As I just said - you had already posted it in full so it would have been pretty stupid of me to attempt to re-jig it.
Anyway, would I try to pass off a hookey cutting in the presence of such a master of the art as yourself?
Stop feckin' wriggling - you're bang-to-rights bor!
Now address your own selective editing.
You have based your case on tampered cuttings and drawn attention to them ad nauseum.
"You are quick to call me liar."
And you are just as quick to prove yourself a liar
Jim Carroll