I don't know what Keith's point is, Steve. How should I? He is not my 'mate', we have never met. I simply feel he is being consistently misrepresented in posts at least as cogently expressed as any of my poor efforts {rude? insulting? moi!], which I consider unfair.

My point is simply that certain very specific numbers have been published which show a remarkable over-representation in certain places of members of a certain community in a particular malfeasance; I find this worrying; I speculate, without coming to any conclusion tho obviously listening to suggestions from other informed people like ex-cabinet-ministers and leaders of the community in question, as to the possible causes of this.

I find the lack of worry about this from those of you over there most questionable motive-wise, suspecting, I think reasonably and as I have never concealed, that you are deliberately ignoring such evidence as there is, as it fails to conform to certain predetermined political doctrines which you embrace.

That is all my point. I am still not sure what yours is.

~Michael~