"Made by the child victims of the rapists."

It is reported that children have made allegations.

You have not see these allegations.

You don't know what they are or how many there are.

You know nothing about them.



"I believe the raped children."

You use evidence that you haven't seen, that you do not even know exists, as the premise of your argument.

In other words, you do not even have evidence that your evidence exists.

Yet you claim to know what that evidence is and that it is reliable.


So you don't know for sure that this "testimony" exists, and you don't know what it is or who gave it, but if it does exist and the people who gave it are children and if they have been raped, then it must be true, and therefore it qualifies as firm evidence to support your hypothesis .....


...... your powres of self deception are legendary.