"How can you deny such a truth?
You would rather make liars of the young victims than admit you are wrong."

No Keith,

It would be meaningless to comment on whether someone is a liar or telling the truth if I have no idea who they are or what they have said.

The same applies to you.

You say you are relying on the testimony of the victims.

But you have never seen any of this testimony and you have no idea who gave it.

Which makes you a fantasist.

Your case is based on who you imagine the allegers to be and what you imagine their allegations to be.

And this is all based on a second hand report.

You you have no idea who made these allegations or why. It could be parents, or it could even be non parent adults with an axe to grind.

But that kind of speculation is irrelevant because YOU DON'T KNOW because YOU HAVEN'T SEEN ANY EVIDENCE.

The only actual testimony provided here is from a victim of the 56 convicted gang members. No new cases or epidemic there, just the same crime as we started out with, involving a Pakistani Gang, in which (for a pakistani gang) white people seem to be overrepresented.