Andrewe: so the website that you point to tries to prove that what the government said about there being a 757 that crashed into the Pentagon is actually proof of a Gov. cover-up because various witnesses have agreed with the government's story. He tries to reveal a conspiracy by saying that what the conspirators have told you is true.
He notes photos of debris that have been photo-shopped, but I have seen versions of those same images without the obvious layering of photoshop textures.
The logic is so circular, but twisted that I think the value of Pi has been rounded to 3.0.
BTW, this guy's theory would mean that the lawsuit that Lizzie thinks is proof is a government conspiracy too; making the gal who brought the suit AND Lizzie complicit in the conspiracy. Points to you Lizzie. The nuttier you appear to be, the better you are doing your job. Ingenious!
...Or maybe Andrew, you by linking to the website, have revealed yourself as an agent of the shadow government's convoluted plot. This recursion thing can be fun.
I'm probably an agent too because my denial is likely a red herring meant to make the doubters doubt while doubting doubting...wait, if I was, that's just the kind of thing that I would say. So I should deny it. But that's just what you expect me to do, so that PROVES the Iocaine is in the second glass.
BTW I'm really not an agent of the shadow government...really...I promise.