Oh I see ...

... SO it isn't keiths hypothesis that Pakistanis are closet Paedos ... he is merely reporting it ... impartially ...

round and round we go again.

But no cigar keith.

That old sleight of hand was debunked about 1000 posts ago.

Your whole purpose has been to defend that hypothesis through thick and thin (gong on for 3 months now), you clearly stated that it was your hypothesis that Pakistani culture was responsible for these crimes.

Only you thought at that time that it forced young men to go and seek satisfaction elsewhere.

But the evidence is that young men were merely used as bait by HIGHLY organized traffickers of an international nature...

... so it isn't the fizzing popping testosterone and these crimes bear no recognizable Pakistani features.

As for the idea that there are no other explanations, that has also already been dealt with - the dando institute have given a plausible explanation that Keith refuses to acknowledge, that is not based on political opinion but on scientific likelihood.

Round and round - la la la - fighting to prove that Pakistanis are different.