"And please remember, I DID NOT MAKE THAT HYPOTHESIS.
I DO NOT HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CULTURE.
It was made by people who do."

Of course not keith.

You have just been (impartially of course) defending it to the hilt for nearly two and a half months.


but what is this ...


"From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 27 Jan 11 - 05:57 AM

My hypothesis is that the absence of girls available for sexual relationships in the BP culture may be linked to their young men being over represented in this type of crime."

________________________________________________

which is another way of saying this


"From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 14 Feb 11 - 05:39 AM

Men are predisposed because there is no outlet for sexual relationships within the community, and no intimate relationship permitted outside.

But only a tiny minority, the weak and wicked, succumb."


Except that you call it your hypothesis.


Your position is consistent throughout.


Wilmers 400 have still only been REPORTED to have made ALLEGATIONS.

Still not evidence to support the racist hypothesis to which you have pledged your loyalty.