I think we are agreed, Jim, that we differ as to the significance or effects of Keith's posts and points; there is probably no purpose in our pursuing that argument further. My point was simply that I thought your arguments would come over more cogently if expressed more moderately and less abusively. It is always more effective if one can keep one's temper, whatever the provocation. Most people {unless looking for the perverse enjoyment which comes from watching someone 'losing it'} would have preferred to watch Stan Smith play tennis rather than John McEnroe, despite the frequent brilliance of the latter's play. I know I certainly did.

~M~