Not talking about his posts Mike, am referring to his openly dishonest behaviour, which you have chosen not to comment on: his doctoring of 'evidence', his innuendos of a dirty-tricks campaign on mine and Lively's part, his posting of snide attacks on other threads and and fact that the implication of what he has repeated over and over again is that we are liars, stupid and (his current approach) if we do not endorse his hypocritical plea for sympathy, heartless bastards who ignore or support paedophelia.
"Remember this innuendo Jim?"
Not innuendo Keith - statement of fact. You took Lively's findings, which he introduced into the discussion sensitively and responsibly, and emblazoned it all over the thread (in case it disappeared!!!) and used those dreadful cases as an emotional jack-hammer to make your racist point over and over again, and are still doing so as a piece of emotional blackmail (endorse what I say or you are all heartless bastards).
You are so unimaginitive that you even took Mike's name-calling of Lox and used it yourself - if not word-for-word, certainly in form - want me to dig it out?.
Whatever points you or we may or may not have made here, your behaviour has been abominable towards others you are debating with.
Nobody really gives a shit about name-calling, we all do it at times, but at least we try to respond honestly to each other's points, even when we disagree.
Jim Carroll