---Mike, am referring to his openly dishonest behaviour, which you have chosen not to comment on:---

Why, Jim, yes I have: by saying more than once I do not perceive it as dishonest quite as you do; but that is not the issue I have been pursuing of late ...

it was the tone, rather than the content, of your posts that I have been commenting on these last couple of times.

{Where has Keith used my 'name-calling of Lox' btw? I don't remember calling anyone any names; only recall his disobliging refs to me a while since ~~ since when he & I have exchanged some observations without too much heat, IIRC.}

~M~