"Jim and Lox have kept this thread alive for nearly 3 months by blindly denying the truth of the over-rep, in the teeth of overwhelming evidence, and with absolutely nothing to substantiate their claims.
The dogma-driven duo, plus Don!"


OK

1. Find a quote of my Dogma ... you can't ... because it doesn't exist.

2. "nothing to substantiate their claims" ... this is projection mate.


Lets compare your "evidence" with some of THE evidence ... starting with Straws opinion

his idea was based on the notion of Young Pakistani men fizzing and popping with testosterone who needed to find sexual gratification outside a closed culture where sex was unavailable.

Right?

But the victims testimony is that the young men were used as bait by highly organized crime cells.

So the victims think that frustrated testosterone fuelled young men aren't the reason for the crimes, but are used as bait by the real criminals.

In other words the victims testimony contradicts Jack Straw and you.

I think that renders Straws unqualified mass psychological diagnosis not only as mere opinion, but also as categorically wrong.

Unless you ignore the victims.

To quote you Keith - WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE VICTIMS? ..... hmmmmm?