In fact there is no over-representation whatever of Pakistani involvement in these crimes and, other than your own, there is no claim of there being one outside of one trial involving 17 criminals. You have used the term "massive over-representation" 28 times without presenting one shred of evidence, apart from "a politician said it so it must be true" - no politician has ever made such a claim, and if they had they would need to present proof in order to back up such a serious accusation; no such proof has ever been presented by anybody - and politicians being what they are, any evidence would need to be microscopically examined.
You have taken some meaningless random figures which any one of us could have done from any racial group in Britain to prove they were over-represented, and you have ignored and continue to ignore everything that others have said, as is your wont.
The accusation of over-representation is yours and yours alone, and the additition 'massive' is your own racist twist on your own invention. The burden of proof lies with you alone, that is how natural justice works - none of us can possibly disprove an accusation that has not been proven in the first place.
We've shown you ours, now you show us yours.
Welcome back Keith; your departure was a light gone from our lives, your return, a new dawning!!
And by the way - your repoening this dead thread puts paid to the lie that Lox and I have kept this thread open for three months - your postings must be well into the 600s now - far, far in excess of any other single poster by a mile - even Nick Griffiths hasn't shown that level of dedication to his cause.
Jim Carroll