"I do not accept that there are any contradictions."

I see, well lets look at this again then.

Straw, Cryer et all, say that these crimes are the result of young men, fizzing and popping with testosterone, whose urge to sow their wild oats is frustrated by their culture.

The victims say that the fizzing and popping of young mens testosterone is not responsible, they are merely used as Bait.

So one source say it is young mens need for sexual release, and the other says it isn't.

Those are opposing viewpoints.

They contradict each other.

On what basis do you not accept that?