So to clarify,

You have presented a hypothesis, which you described, literally and specifgically as your hypothesis.

This Hypothesis is that Pakistanis are predisposed to trafficking and rape due to cultural restrictions on their sexuality.

And you state that this hypothesis originates with Straw, Cryer, Ahmed etc, who refer to young men (fizzing and popping with testosterone) being forced to act out their sexual urges on unwilling children.

It is in fact the whole purpose of you entering this discussion.

It is your whole purpose for trying to establish some kind of overrepresentation.

You agree that it is a cultural issue and you are trying to prove it.

You have shown great interest in it up til now.

Yet you have suddenly lost interest ever since it became clear that the victims testimony clearly and unequivocally contradicts your hypothesis.

Why are you ignoring the victims Keith?

They are telling you something very specific.

They are telling you that their ordeal is a consequence of organized crime.

Why won't you believe the victims Keith?

How can you ignore the testimony of these raped children Keith?

Hmmm?