Looking back over the reviews of a recent album I was involved in it seemed like each review was of a different album, which is fair enough given the bredth of such things & the utter subjectivity of journalism. But no such thing as absolutes, other than absolute bollocks coming from the nay-sayers revealing their lack of nouce. I honestly think if a reviewer can't find something good to say about an album they should pass it over to someone who can. After all, it's only ever a matter of taste, even in the concensus-driven wilderness of folk.