Doug,
Um, "laughable?" I took time and energy and found a good site *out of the many I found* with a concise defense of my point. Did you take any time to do any fact-checking of their citations? Or is your best argument just the rhetorical that it is "...laughable?"

The article has many active links to actual articles about actual events. Did you look at any of the links to actual events or trends? Do you deny that the events took place or the trends are taking place?

So I'll put it back on you. Demonstrate that the facts I cited are wrong, and get your information from someone or somewhere that can be fact-checked and does not have a reputation for intentionally distorting the facts.

I am satisfied with my point and my factual defense of it. If all you are going to do is to say that my effort is "laughable" and not cite facts and use reason, then I will not waste my energy responding further.

Saul