" Covered."   By denial.   Not good enough.

If, dear Greg, you don't realize that your post of 17 April 2011 was indeed scatological, you need, in the worst way, to make the acquaintance of a dictionary.

Perhaps for the first time.

And that post contributes remarkably little--even for you--to the discussion.   In fact it's slightly discouraging to try to carry on a conversation with somebody who claims to be an educated person, but is much closer to a potty-mouthed 6 year old.

I also note with interest how other posters on other threads recently have also enjoyed your delightful contributions.    Your coarse attacks on Doug R, for instance, can have the effect of arousing sympathy for him, despite his extreme stances on various issues.    But I'm sure that has no effect on you--as long as you can continue to run off at the mouth in your patented vulgar fashion.

Now, back to topic:    If you don't think Obama did well in the threatened government shutdown crisis, for the n'th time, why not?    None of your posts, while revealing more about you than we really want to know, have revealed a countertheory on the shutdown crisis.

It begins to look as if you have no idea--and no intention to do anything but whine, sneer, and favor us with singularly stupid vulgarisms.    But I'm sure that's not the case. We hope.






to be continued