"I am putting the case for an over-rep."
You can't pick and choose what your bit you believe if your 'experts are as esteemed as you claim them to be - (or, in your case, edit your cut-'n-pastes when it suits you).
You have put up the Barnados statement to back up your case - are they right or wrong in saying that:
"the children had 'been forgotten as discussion has focused on the ethnicity of perpetrators in high-profile cases".
Are you claiming to know better than Barnardo's who have clearly protested at the type of racist use you are making of the issue?
If they (and the others in the quote) are wrong on such a fundamental issue, can we put any faith whatever in such 'experts', or do we pick and mix to support our own perverted views as you are doing here?
You have persistantly attempted to claim Pakistanis are culturally inclined towards paedophelia (please don't make me put your quotes up again.)
There is no over-representation until you prove there is - you haven't, so there isn't - doesn't get much simpler than that
And the street grooming - where do you stand on that following the Barnados statement - are they wrong on that one too?
As far as I am concerned the racist issue is just that - a racist issue which you continue to peddle - making you - a racist.
Interesting to see that things haven't changed while I've been away - didn't expebct them to really - leaopards, spots and all that.
Jim Carroll