"That is from that January Guardian piece that we have surely done to death already."
These comments post-date and are responses to Jack Straw's statement which you have used throughout this thread to back up your argument (after careful editing).
You continue to claim that the Barnados article backs up your conclusions when it patently does not; on the contrary, Barnardos have made the point that using race and culture in the abuse debate diverts the issue and runs the risk of adding to the abuse of children, yet you continue to do just that
"Jim claimed it racist to consider child abuse in the context of culture or race"
Please withdraw this piece of misinformation and stop deliberately distorting what I and others have said - it is you who needs to debate honestly; nobody else here has edited threads to make their point.
You claim that we have put up no argument - yes we have and it is typical of your debating style that you have deliberately ignored what has been said - something that has been pointed out to you again and again, here and on other threads, Is time you stopped ignoring and distorting what other people have said.
"There is an over-rep, but not exclusively of BPs."
But you have been saying not only is there an over-representation of Pakistanis, but it is part of their culture - is this a change of direction?
"That was your shortest goodbyeee yet Jim,"
I will come and go here as I see fit - if you find my presence so disturbing that you need to comment on it, stop mangling what I have said.
And a reminder; as much effort as you have put into drifting this thread to prove Pakistanis are culturally perverted, it does not belong to you and those of us (and there are several, not just me) who have returned to it rather than allow you to continue to use it as a platform, will do so as often as we please.
It might help if you didn't distort what we have said when you thought it was safe to do so.
Jim Carroll