""The idea that all those cases of BPs offending was a statistical fluke and a huge, ongoing coincidence was laughable.
Back then we had many hundreds of victims.
We now have 2000 in 3 years.
The idea that it was simply that the gangs involved just happened to be BP gangs, was my case too.""

Another disingenuous response from our resident wriggler.

The original hundreds (according to you) of victims are what we are discussing here. They are the small number of localised cases known to be the responsibility of Pakistani gangs.

Those new figures, which you so blithely use to bolster your distorted view, have not yet adduced a shred of evidence to suggest a large, let alone disproportionate, involvement of any particular ethnic grouping.

Knowing that, I would like a response to my question:-

Is my suggested alternative possible, YES, or NO?

I am entirely uninterested in whether you choose to believe it, just answer honestly, for the first time on this thread, the question you were asked.

Don T.