Wow, PDQ, such contradiction, right in the first two sentences. How do you reconcile a desire to have the government not tell people how to behave with a desire to have the government tell people who they can sleep with?

Once again, all the assholes who want to use the government to force other people to "behave" must be fought in every place they are.

Anyone who thinks that abortion, homosexuality, discrimination or financial equality are part of he Constitution should have their head examined.

You're really not making much sense. Besides, it is in the Constitution, it's called equal treatment under the law. What's not mentioned in the Constitution is any definition of marriage.

The right to private gun ownership is in the great founding document and only a few fringe nuts think it isn't.

Which militia are they all members of? Selective reading of the 2nd Amendment is the only way that anyone can say that private gun ownership is a Constitutional right. If you really think opposition to unlimited private gun ownership is only present in fringe nuts, you are sadly misinformed about what's going on.

Restore fiscal responsibility

You failed to respond to some questions I put you earlier about fiscal responsibility. Telling me I'm wrong isn't an answer. There's lots of money. The problem is who gets it and who doesn't.

To be sure, abortion clinics must be sanitary and the personel must be trained and certified. That constitutes "reasonable restrictions" and everyone should be fine with that.

Agreed. Are the Kansas restrictions reasonable, as in are they the same as for any other medical clinic?

Abortion of a healthy fetus at 8 1/2 months is wrong in my book, but as a libertarian, I would allow others to do what they want. They should be grown-up enough to let others do the same.

Glad to hear it. Do you support all the efforts all over the country to make abortion unavailable to poor women? If so, now is that not the government telling us how to behave?