"The smirking naysayer who quips "there is no evidence for that (temperature rise)", disregards the concern for what it all means come 2032."

And the fool who thinks that I smirk while posting, that my post was a quip, or that I disregard future effects (why 2032 particularly?), none of which can be determined from my post, would do better to keep quiet.

"The naysayer reminds of a troll"

Well, of course, he would, wouldn't he? Anyone who posts an opinion with which Donuel disagrees must be a troll, it stands to reason.

I do point out, however, that my quibble about evidence refers to the (A)nthropogenic bit of AGW, not to any particular value of (G)lobal (W)arming.