At no point have I stated that Ian Anderson was responsible for the review.
I can dedicate comments to who I like, just as reviewers can write what they like, its called freedom of speech, so Matt and Vic,I am exercising my right to say what I like, just as reviewers exercise their pens on other peoples musical careers
but now with you tube, the music can be presented to the public,and the public can make their own judgements on the music.
Matt, I am not banging on about froots, I am commenting on a review in Folk Roots, a different publication., which again was different from Southern Rag
Vic, please get your facts right, this has nothing to do with froots I think you will find that most of the reviews you are talking about were in southern rag or folk roots, which is not froots, THAT REVIEW APPEARED IN FOLK ROOTS.
The anonymous reviewer described the vocals as decidedly uninspired, that is his privilege , it is my privelige to put up my singing, and let people judge for themselves