Sawzaw, you are a hopeless nincompoop.

By using the example of "dogs pooping in yards," I was not saying that YOU said it, I was giving you a reduction ad absurdum example of your spurious attack on Bobert. As I said, reductio ad absurdum is a logical device for EXPOSING a spurious argument, which YOU keep making against Bobert.

You are either writhing like a trapped snake or you are abysmally stupid ill-informed about the rules of rational debate (established by Aristotle over two millennia ago).

And as to not having facts, we have presented many facts have been presented to you, but you stubbornly refuse to recognize them as such because you just don't like them. Too bad about you.

You must lead a very limited life.

Don Firth