"alarmist computer models"

Its not the satellite data that is in question here. It is the over interpretation. I don't think it is any great feat to surpass "Alarmist" predictions. That is a far cry form saying that "global warming" Does not exist. It certainly does not prove that CERN said that it does not exist, considering that only the opponents of generally accepted climate science are the only ones using the term "global warming." The claim in title of this thread remains highly suspect.