The jury is still out because the neutrino speed must be verified but it looks like a promising refutation of Einstein.

The laws of "who's" economics is important here. The resultant economic gap between wealth and poverty is due more to a lack of understanding of economics given by various sources.

Behaviors of "knowing", "seeing", "perception" are a function of the brain, not anything outside of it, as evidenced by testing, behavioral modification through electronic means,
and the inability to concretely observe metaphysical theories through empirical ways.

No brain, no signals.

The active "nothingness" can't be substantiated as scientifically valid.

That's enough for me to say that it doesn't exist.

A creator can be posited as a multi-concept, why does it have to be unitary?
Probably because it represents the child's need for a father figure, usually a sole powerful
person that the child relies on for sustenance and survival. Mother figures don't find their way into contemporary Christianity as a rule with maybe the exception of a Mother Mary who is usually given less status in the Hierarchy.

In a different culture where the delegation of authority is spread around in a family unit, pantheon deities spring up such as in Hindu, Shinto, early Greek or Roman.

Whether it's a pantheon, a monolithic deity, an earth-bound figure, a ghost or spirit of some sort, none of this has been verifiable through scientific consensus.