"Israel denies it and no evidence has been produced."
The Israelis would deny it - wouldn't they?
Enough evidedence has been produced for the Israelis to have been DIRECTLY IMPLICATED IN THE KILLING OF up to 3,500 REFUGEES BY AN INDEPENDENT ENQUIRY. THE MASSACRE COULD NEVER HAVE TAKEN PLACE WITHOUT THE FULL CO-OPERATION OF THE ISRAELI TROOPS AND EVEN THEIR GOVERNMENT HAVE BEEN FORCED TO ADMIT PARTIAL COMPLICITY - WITH THEIR TRACK RECORD OF FINDING THEMSELVES NOT GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES, THIS IS ITSELF AN INDICATION OF PROFOUND IMPLICATION IN THESE MASSACRES which appear in virtually every list of Israeli massacres as an Israeli war crime.
Eye witness descriptions have been produced and the man in charge was even in line to be prosecuted until he was elected prime minister.
Robert Fisk's artical not only implicates the Israeli troops of having providing the transport and illumination for the massacres and opening the gates to let the killers in, but also claims that not only were the troops present at the massacres, but also were possibly actively implicated.
As I said - holocaust denial in reverse.
"The "cultural implant" (not my words)"
Whose words are they - you used them?
Who else has claimed such a "cultural implant" and said that this is possessed by " ALL MALE PAKISTANIS"? You have yet to produce one quote using these descriptions - and even if you produced 100, without research or documented evidence to back them up IT IS A RACIST STATEMENT AND THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE PERSENTED IT AS YOUR OPINION in order to prove that a "massive, massive" proportion of BPs are involved in illegal sex with under-age girls makes it YOUR racist statement.
Jim Carroll