No, Guest Jon, I am not suggesting anything you allude to.

Each case has to be looked at on it's own circumstances/merits. Clouding the issue by dragging up other indirect, (and, even remote) cases and issues, IMO, merely clouds the case to be made. Considering so many people seem to believe in this mans innocence, surely a more direct case can be presented?

So, what do you, yourself, have to offer to advance the case of this mans innocence? I am merely asking, Where's the beef?