Jim: I supported Keith in no racism on that long-since Pakistani thread; I simply pointed out that you provided no convincing instance of his having expressed any, but were simply convicting him in your own 'made-up-so-don't-confuse-me-with-facts' mind on the grounds of some statements you had taken your doctrinaire exception to in earlier threads.
Your counter-warning to me about this is mere evasive 'whataboutery', in no way contradictive of my pointing out that it is no use your constantly denying being antisemitic while you persist in employing a usage which you know, because you have repeatedly been told so, is widely, even universally, accepted as antisemitic. Whatever misinterpretations you might have put on posts of mine on previous threads, only tenuously, if at all, related to this one, the fact is not altered that YOU PERSIST IN ADOPTING A USAGE WHICH YOU KNOW TO BE INTRINSICALLY ANTISEMITIC, and then come on all wounded 'poor-misunderstood-me' if accused of antisemitism.
You can't have it both ways, Jim. Stop using the word "Holocaust" in relation to Israel or we shall all KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are an antisemite. What Keith or I may or may not think of Pakistanis who interfere with girls in Bradford, like ♫the flowers that bloom in the spring tra-la♫ {W S Gilbert, The Mikado} has nothing to do with the case.