NO I AM NOT - WE HAVE CONSTANTLY DISCUSSED MASSACRES - WHAT YOU ACTUALLY WROTE WAS NO MASSACRES AT ALL indicating that you were referring to all of them that had been pointed out to you,

Not true Jim.
I read right through the old thread up to that post.
Only those 2 massacres discussed.
Deny that?
I did a quick 5 word post (not counting "at alls") and clarified when I had time next post.
It was just about those 2 massacres.

That was over a month of solid debate ago and I have never denied all massacres.

Deny that?

If you have to resort to dishonesty to make your case, is it worth making Jim?