"a sordid little holocaust and ethnic cleansing supporter;"

were the actual words I took exception to, Jim ~~ or indeed, only one word thence, the 4th. You appeared to appreciate this fact at the time ~

Yet in a later post, you rendered this as

"Mike objected to my describing it as comparable with holocaust denial!!!"

which I didn't, because you didn't make any such comparison ~ or if you did, none that I noticed or responded to.

"ven Mike, with his racist double standards..."

you exclaim in a later post. I have none such, as you well know, for all your rhetoric.

I am in a state of constant puzzlement as to the identity of this non-existent entity, to whom you attribute my name but no views in any way resembling mine; and as to what point or points you are intending to make in doing so. This "Mike" you have created and keep invoking must be some other fellow entirely. He certainly shares none of my opinions, says nothing that I have ever said, and indeed bears no identifiable relationship to me whatsoever. He seems to be some avatar of your Aunt Sally that you have set up for the sole purpose of knocking down. Why you should have named him after me I cannot imagine.

I have tried to reply rationally to your irrationalities, but it has turned out to be nothing but pissing-in-the-wind so far as what I have written has penetrated your entrenched unsupportable assumptions as to what you think I might have meant ~ but didn't. You really are in a state of near-hysterical confusion, Jim; I should go & have a nice long lie-down if I were you, before you do yourself a mischief.