"and it was all made up!"
And again, as in other threads, you are reduced to denying the evidence put in front of you.
You have already acknowledged that evidence by descibing the weapons sold to Assad as "sniper bullets", The 'Gun Thug' has acknowledged their existance with his "Snipers have to practice...".
You have persistantly wailed "thread drift" claiming that your "sniper bullets" don't belong in this discussion because they are not heavey weapons - despite the fact that the people going about their daily business (women shopping with their children) are being cut down by your (now claimed as non-existant, despite the fact that it was you who identified them as such) British supplied "sniper bullets".
Crassly, even for you, you have actually wailed "thread drift" on the same posting as your deliberately attempting to 'drift the thread' to Palestine as a diversion.
Palestine has no place on this thread, any of the Arab Spring protests have, yet you have desperately attempted to drag in the former as a smoke-screen for your lack of argument for supplying weapons to murderous dictators.
Not one of you: 'The Idiot', 'The Gun Thug' or 'Weirdie Bruce' has acknowledged the supplying of military equipment and weapons to Gadaffi; (incidently Brucie) - those names are "insults" - "mealy-mouthed apologist hypocrite who supports terrorist states and their armourers" is a pretty fair description of how the three of you have behaved here and elsewhere.   
I have no intention of repeating information I have already produced - "you'll have had your facts and figures" as the ladies of Morningside would say, you have acknowledges those as facts by attempting to explain them away as unimportant (one more time, "sniper bullets" and "Snipers have to practice"); renaging on that acceptance is not going to work - done deal, I'm afraid.
Neither is continually accusing me of not condemning Russia and China - I have and I do, but as far as I'm concerned, this as no more of a crime against humanity than supplying Keith's "sniper bullets" to cut down civilians in Homs (or having supplied the wherewithal to train snipers so they can cut those civilians down more efficiently, if you'd rather).
Demanding the repetition of evidence that has already been produced AND ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED - ONCE AGAIN "SNIPER BULLETS" and "SNIPERS HAVE TO PRACTICE" IS PART OF YOUR WAR OF ATTRITION AND IT AIN'T GONNA WORK HERE
"YOU are the one who refuses to take those who support Assad to task"
Not me Brucie - it is Keithie who has proposed supplying riot control gear to Assad - you can't get better support for a dictator than that (unless you claim that supplying him with military equipment to cut down civilians hasn't happened, of course) - he has neither acknowledged nor withdrawn that statement, so it stands as open and continued support for human rights crimes as far as I'm concerned.
As far as "Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, Russia, and China. YOU have repeatedly supported those entities in the past", it has no place here, but I HAVEN'T AND I DON'T - BUT IF YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE, FEEL FREE....
And incidently - repeated reference to my mother only serve to illustrate what a spinlelessly unprincipled and cowardly little shit you really are - please continue - as I said, she would have been delighted to have been involved.....
"You have not come out of this well Jim."
Matter of opinion Keithie, but it's you who will continue to be the one who suggested arming a murderous dictator with riot gear to suppress demands for democratic changes.
Now, if there is nothing else - back to my book.
Jim Carroll
PS Sorry this is so long Keithie - perhaps you can get somebody to read it for you!