dmcg-agreeing with shimrods unsubstantiated assertion that the factors involved in the flood could not produce geologic change; even though demonstrating no rationale for that denial.
certainly the flood was no tranquil cruise but it has been demonstrated that the dimensions of the ark would make it seaworthy and stable in the most adverse conditions.this is in contrast to the alternative accounts which i believe distantly recall the flood but contain unrealistic details.

I asserted that the flood could not cause geological change on anything like the scale you require. You can check that very easily at any library, but you don't have to, because of course the bible claims the geological changes gave rise the flood, not the other way around.

You say the ark would be seaworthy and stable in the most adverse conditions. Really? You know what the recent tsunami was like for those nearby? That is negligable compared to the ones that would occur if the entire surface of the earth was being reshaped in a matter of days. And did I even claim the ark would be sunk? No, I claimed that sitting next to elephant turning a funny shade of green would be unpleasant.