dcmg-i think you read me pretty accurately.however evidence produced against an ancient earth i would have thought is evidence for a younger earth ,though of course not proving the actual age deduced from biblical data .

i dont actually object to evolutionism being taught either as long as it is not pushed as a proven fact.history is eye witness accounts ;geography is verifiable ;operational science is subject to repeat experiment etc etc.origins science is not repeatable and the data is interpreted.