Almost all major events which produce National trauma get over-analyzed... and soon rhetorical questions begin to distort the review of relevant evidence.
"Why didn't they....?"
"What happened to the...?"
"Did you realize that at the same time.....?"
"How could X..or Y...or Z have happened when....?"

Then, those who propose the conspiracy theories simply ignore ANY amount of contrary evidence...even from experts... and repeat the same questions and claims, asserting that their 'armchair' analysis makes more sense.

I have no doubt the there ARE attempted conspiracies and that certain acts WOULD be done, if possible.... but there are ways of evaluating contradictory stories that make it fairly easy to see which ones are not too likely. The problem is, if a possible conspiracy can get a 3% possible rating, there are those who will believe it over the 97% official version.


....and I am SO totally tired of 'Building 7'. It HAS been explained, whether or not one likes the Warren commission version. (I have read reams of stuff on it...and watched videos, and seen pics, and seen schematic drawings of the structure showing WHY it reacted as it did.)