Yes, it was, and I still didn't like it. I did look up that it was Sickert she thought it was. I would have been a lot more convinced had the evidence to the contrary, or that which was not sickert-linked, been at least presented. Instead, she just went through and said See how much evidence there is that Sickert did it.

I prefer to see all 4 squares of my contingency.

99% of mad rapists probably smoked pot at some point... but so did 99% of people who aren't/weren't/won't be mad rapists, so that doesn't tell you anything without the other squares.