And by the way, if you compare paragraphs 29 and 31 of the judgment you will see the bending of the logic - which is over and above the ridiculously unjust nature of the obligation to extradite contained in the Extradition Act.

Further the unverified reports of the statements of Gibson are prayed in aid to demonstrate the truth of the allegation that Tappin had done what Gibson alleged. That is the sort of thing that the rules against hearsay ought still to strike down.